1. Effective Judicial Protection Within the Community Legal Order
- Centralised and Decentralised Enforcement of Community Law
- Legal Framework of Community Intervention in National Remedies and Procedural Rules
- Nature and Structure of Analysis to Follow
2. ‘Integration Through Law’ and the Enforcement Deficit Debate
- ‘Integration Through Law’: Uniformity and Effectiveness
- ‘Integration Through Law’: The Traditional Parameters of the Enforcement Deficit Debate
3. Regulatory Differentiation Within the Community Legal Order
- Vertical Differentiation
- Horizontal Differentiation
4. Regulatory Differentiation and the Enforcement Deficit Debate
- ‘Integration Through Law’: Differentiation and the Enforcement Deficit Debate
- Differentiation as a Symptom of Constitutional Change
- Differentiation as a Cause of Constitutional Change
The Enforcement Deficit Debate: An Alternative Sectoral Model
5. The Court of Justice’s Caselaw on National Remedies and Procedural Rules I
- Early Period: Extensive Deference to National Autonomy
- Middle Period: The Assertion of Increasing Community Remedial Competence
- Current Caselaw: A General Trend Towards Negative Harmonisation
- Sectoral Credentials of the General Trend Towards Negative Harmonisation in the Current Caselaw
6. The Court of Justice’s Caselaw on National Remedies and Procedural Rules II
- Centralised and Decentralised Enforcement Against Community Institutions
- Recovery of Unlawful State Aids
- Decentralised Enforcement of Competition Policy
Contents: