Stockholm International Arbitration Review 2009:2
   
 
Titel:Stockholm International Arbitration Review 2009:2
Utgivningsår:2011
Omfång:183 sid.
Förlag:Juris Publishing
ISBN:1558271X092
Typ av verk:Samlingsverk
Serie:Stockholm International Arbitration Review nr. 2009:2
Ämnesord:Processrätt

Pris: 891 SEK exkl. moms

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

ARTICLES
Amici Curiae in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: Authority and Procedural Fairness
Boris Kasolowsky and Caroline Harvey

Navigating in the Archipelago of Swedish Due Process Safeguards: A Sea Chart indicating a Few Treacherous Reefs
Finn Madsen

Obtaining Revision of "Swiss" International Arbital Awards: Whence after Thalès?
Dr. Charles Poncet

Manifest Lack of Jurisdiction? A Selection of Decisions of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce concerning the Prima Facie Existence of an Arbitration Agreement (2005-2009)
David Ramsjö and Siri Strömberg

Preventing the Multiple and Concurrent Arbitration Proceedings: Waiver Clauses
Antoine Romanetti

Waiving the Right to Arbitrate by Initiating Court Proceedings
Bengt-Åke Johnsson and Ola Nilsson

COURT DECISIONS ON ARBITRATION
Sweden

Supreme Court of Sweden Decision in Case No: Ö 13-09 on April 16, 2010 133

Subject Matter:
Application seeking recognition and enforcement of a foreign award.
Service of a request for arbitration at an address mentioned in the parties'
contract but which was no longer valid at the time of service. Respondent
not otherwise notified of the arbitration proceedings' existence. Whether
respondent was duly notified of arbitration proceedings' existence within
the meaning of Section 54 Subsection 2 of the Swedish Arbitration Act.



Supreme Court of Sweden Decision in Case No: B 156-09 on
June 9, 2010"Korsnäs AB vs. AB Fortum Värme Samägt Med
Stockholms Stad" 139

Subject Matter:
Whether one of the arbitrators in the arbitral tribunal did not meet the
impartiality requirements imposed by the Swedish Arbitration Act. Whether
the arbitrator in question had such ties to the law firm representing the
respondent so as to unauthorise him from participating in the proceedings.
Question of to which extent an arbitrator can accept appointments as
arbitrator by the same law firm without creating the impression of having
attachments to the law firm.

Swedish Svea Court of Appeal in Case No: T 4548-08 on December
12, 2009 "Systembolaget AB VS. V&S Vin & Sprit AB" 149

Subject Matter:
Whether the Arbitral Tribunal took a decision based on circumstances
that had not been invoked by the parties and, consequently, the Arbitral
Tribunal has exceeded its mandate (Section 34, first paragraph, subsection
(2) of the Swedish Arbitration Act).
 
  © 2017 Jure AB