|  | | Pris: 1157 SEK exkl. moms    |  |  What rules or principles govern the assessment of evidence in EU competition enforcement? This book offers, for the first time, a comprehensive academic study on the topic. Its aim is twofold. Firstly, it produces a typology of evidence standards in competition proceedings at the EU level, thereby systemising the guidance that is currently dispersed in the case-law of the EU Courts. Secondly, it examines the applicable evidence rules and principles with a view to better understanding their role in EU competition enforcement. In so doing, the book illustrates that evidence standards are not mere technicalities and their significance should not be underestimated. Rigorous and engaging, this work provides a much-needed analysis of a key question of EU competition enforcement. 
 Table Of Contents
 Summary of Contents
 
 1. Introduction
 I. Evidence Matters in the Spotlight
 II. A Simple Question, an Unclear Answer: What Standards Govern the Evaluation of Evidence?
 III. Purpose, Approach and Scope
 IV. Structure
 
 2. Evidence Standards in EU Competition Enforcement: Autonomous, But Not Independent
 I. Introduction
 II. A Primer on Evidence Law and Theory
 III. Evidence Standards and EU Competition Enforcement
 IV. Conclusion
 
 3. The Burden of Proof in EU Competition Enforcement
 I. Introduction
 II. The Concept of the Burden of Proof and its Significance
 III. The Burden of Proof in Antitrust Cases
 IV. The Burden of Proof in Merger Cases
 V. Conclusion
 
 4. The Standard of Proof in EU Competition Enforcement
 I. Introduction
 II. The Concept of the Standard of Proof and its Significance
 III. The Main Reasons for the Ambivalence Over the Applicable Standard of Proof
 IV. The Regulation of the Standard of Proof in Antitrust and Merger Cases
 V. The Discharge of the Standard of Proof in EU Competition Enforcement
 VI. Conclusion
 
 5. Principles and Problems of Evidence Admissibility and Evaluation
 I. Introduction
 II. Principles Governing Evidence Admissibility and Evaluation in EU Competition Enforcement
 III. Potential Shortcomings in the EU Courts' Approach to Evidence Admissibility
 IV. Potential Shortcomings in the EU Courts' Approach to Evidence Evaluation
 V. Conclusion
 
 6. Presumptions in EU Competition Enforcement
 I. Introduction
 II. The Concept and Significance of Presumptions
 III. Distinguishing Presumptions from Similar Devices in EU Competition Enforcement
 IV. The Main Presumptions in EU Competition Enforcement
 V. The Implications of the Presumptions Used in EU Competition Enforcement
 VI. Conclusion
 
 7. Evidence Standards and Standards of Judicial Review
 I. Introduction
 II. Standards of Judicial Review and Fairness Concerns
 III. The Interplay between Evidence Standards and Standards of Judicial Review
 IV. Conclusion
 8. Reflections
 
 I. Introduction
 II. Some Connotations for the Enforcement System's Risk Proclivity
 III. The Implications for Fairness
 IV. The Connotations for the Application of the Substantive Rules
 V. The Connotations for the EU Institutions
 VI. The Implications for National Procedural Autonomy
 VII. Conclusion
 |  |  | 
 |