Evidence Standards in EU Competition Enforcement
� The EU Approach
| Författare: | Kalintiri Andriani |
| Titel: | Evidence Standards in EU Competition Enforcement � The EU Approach |
| Utgivningsår: | 2020 |
| Omfång: | 280 sid. |
| Förlag: | Hart Publishing |
| ISBN: | 9781509945283 |
| Typ av verk: | Monografi |
| Serie: | Hart Studies in Competition Law |
| Ämnesord: | Marknadsrätt , EU-rätt , Processrätt |
Pris: 506 SEK exkl. moms 
|
 What rules or principles govern the assessment of evidence in EU competition enforcement? This book offers, for the first time, a comprehensive academic study on the topic. Its aim is twofold. Firstly, it produces a typology of evidence standards in competition proceedings at the EU level, thereby systemising the guidance that is currently dispersed in the case-law of the EU Courts. Secondly, it examines the applicable evidence rules and principles with a view to better understanding their role in EU competition enforcement. In so doing, the book illustrates that evidence standards are not mere technicalities and their significance should not be underestimated. Rigorous and engaging, this work provides a much-needed analysis of a key question of EU competition enforcement.Table of Contents Summary of Contents 1. Introduction I. Evidence Matters in the Spotlight II. A Simple Question, an Unclear Answer: What Standards Govern the Evaluation of Evidence? III. Purpose, Approach and Scope IV. Structure 2. Evidence Standards in EU Competition Enforcement: Autonomous, But Not Independent I. Introduction II. A Primer on Evidence Law and Theory III. Evidence Standards and EU Competition Enforcement IV. Conclusion 3. The Burden of Proof in EU Competition Enforcement I. Introduction II. The Concept of the Burden of Proof and its Significance III. The Burden of Proof in Antitrust Cases IV. The Burden of Proof in Merger Cases V. Conclusion 4. The Standard of Proof in EU Competition Enforcement I. Introduction II. The Concept of the Standard of Proof and its Significance III. The Main Reasons for the Ambivalence Over the Applicable Standard of Proof IV. The Regulation of the Standard of Proof in Antitrust and Merger Cases V. The Discharge of the Standard of Proof in EU Competition Enforcement VI. Conclusion 5. Principles and Problems of Evidence Admissibility and Evaluation I. Introduction II. Principles Governing Evidence Admissibility and Evaluation in EU Competition Enforcement III. Potential Shortcomings in the EU Courts' Approach to Evidence Admissibility IV. Potential Shortcomings in the EU Courts' Approach to Evidence Evaluation V. Conclusion 6. Presumptions in EU Competition Enforcement I. Introduction II. The Concept and Significance of Presumptions III. Distinguishing Presumptions from Similar Devices in EU Competition Enforcement IV. The Main Presumptions in EU Competition Enforcement V. The Implications of the Presumptions Used in EU Competition Enforcement VI. Conclusion 7. Evidence Standards and Standards of Judicial Review I. Introduction II. Standards of Judicial Review and Fairness Concerns III. The Interplay between Evidence Standards and Standards of Judicial Review IV. Conclusion 8. Reflections I. Introduction II. Some Connotations for the Enforcement System's Risk Proclivity III. The Implications for Fairness IV. The Connotations for the Application of the Substantive Rules V. The Connotations for the EU Institutions VI. The Implications for National Procedural Autonomy VII. Conclusion |