Administrative Rulemaking and Planning in European Laws
| Författare: | della Cananea Giacinto , Ferrari Zumbini Angela , red. |
| Titel: | Administrative Rulemaking and Planning in European Laws |
| Utgivningsår: | 2025 |
| Omfång: | 368 sid. |
| Förlag: | Oxford University Press |
| ISBN: | 9780198867616 |
| Produkttyp: | Inbunden |
| Typ av verk: | Kommentar |
| Serie: | The Common Core of European Administrative Law |
| Ämnesord: | EU-rätt , Offentlig rätt , Internationell rätt |
Pris: 1436 SEK exkl. moms 
|
 Overview- Provides a comprehensive and in-depth overview of administrative rulemaking and planning - Critically compares the legal systems of Europe, as well as the U.S. and China - the world's leading capital exporters - Illustrates and analyses how public authorities are likely to exercise their powers across ten case studies and the available mechanisms of control - Presents a significant new vision of administrative action, which has previously been considered mainly from the viewpoint of formal adjudication Description Administrative rulemaking and planning is an under-studied and under-theorized area of public law. To better understand how administrative functions and powers are discharged by public authorities and private bodies, this seventh volume in the Common Core of European Administrative Law series argues that we must consider all forms of administrative action, not just formal procedures and judicial review. As such, greater attention needs to be paid to administrative rulemaking and planning, which have a significant impact on economics and society. Through extensive comparative research, this book examines this increasingly important field of administrative law. It focuses mainly on Europe, analysing ten national systems including eight European Union member states, Norway, and the UK, but it also explores the legal systems of the United States and China, as well as that of a non-state entity - the European Union itself. The questions investigated across these systems include whether administrative agencies may fetter their discretion through policy and rules, whether their rules must be published, and what remedies are available when plans adversely impact individual rights. These questions are examined through a factual analysis based on a set of ten hypothetical cases, which are discussed by national experts. This comparative approach identifies commonalities and differences between legal systems, such as in consultation and transparency, in the rights of public service users, and in legal remedies to address rules and plans. As in other volumes in the series, both similarity and difference are essential to understanding how a 'common core' is shaped and evolves. Table of Contents Part I - Common Core Research on Administrative Rulemaking and Planning 1:Introduction, Giacinto della Cananea Part II - The Legal Systems Selected for Comparison: Background and Principles 2:Austria, Stefan Storr and Sophie Praniess 3:China, Xiaowei Sun 4:Czech Republic, Jiří Rajchl, Daniel Burda, and Gabriela Blahoudková 5:European Union, Edoardo Chiti 6:Germany, Lilly Weidemann 7:Hungary, Lilla Berkes and Balázs Szabolcs Gerencsér 8:Italy, Leonardo Parona 9:Netherlands, Jacobine van der Brink, Louise Verboeket, and Veerle van Waarde 10:Norway, Eivind Smith 11:Portugal, Rui Guerra da Fonseca 12:Sweden, Patricia Jonason and Björn Forssén 13:United Kingdom, John Morison and David Mark 14:United States of America, Jeffrey Lubbers and Giacinto della Cananea Part III - Cases 15:Cases Part IV - Comparative Analysis 16:A Comparative Analysis of Administrative Procedure Legislation on Rulemaking, Angela Ferrari Zumbini 17:Commonality and Diversity in Administrative Rulemaking, Giacinto della Cananea 18:Plans: In Between Rules and Decisions, Roberto Caranta |